This court previously dismissed Count Three against Defendant Mary Admire. § 2512, and Count Five alleges civil conversion. Count Three alleges possession, manufacture, and/or assembly of devices used for surreptitious interception of electronic communications in violation of 18 U.S.C. Count Two alleges interception and disclosure of DIRECTV's electronic communications in violation of 18 U.S.C. Counts One and Four of Plaintiff's Complaint concern violations of the Cable Communications Policy Act. Plaintiff originally brought five Counts against each Defendant in its Complaint. The case arises out of Plaintiff's acquisition of shipping records of distributors of devices intended for satellite television signal interception and decryption. Plaintiff DIRECTV alleges that Defendants surreptitiously intercepted and decrypted DIRECTV's satellite signals using devices intended for that purpose, ultimately to gain free viewing of satellite television programming. Johnson, Baty, Holm & Numrich, PC, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |